Can Klout reduce your Gilt? Gilt-Klout co-branded sale

In their new sale which starts today, Gilt gives members the ability to reduce their guilt (about their Gilt e-shopping habit) by using their online popularity score (their Klout) to reduce their Gilt shopping cart bill.

Ever the forerunner of co-branded initiatives, Gilt has now partnered with Klout for a specially curated sale.

The Gilt sale features Klout prominently in a few ways. Most interestingly, the Klout sale section gives Gilt members who are also on Klout additional discounts dependent on their Klout score. Presumably, the better the Klout number, the more discounts. This is interesting as it encourages people who have many social ties to wear the brands that are offered through the sale. Since these people are socially prominent, presumably the brands they wear are noticed more than if they were worn by a wallflower.

Playing the wing-man, the Gilt sale advises non-Klout Gilt members to sign up for the Klout site in order to receive additional discounts.

Additionally, the sale is curated by the four highest ranking Klout members. Curated sales are not new to Gilt, but it’s interesting that they think by getting people with high Klout scores, but still unrecognizable names, will pique interest.

I have seen Klout-related events, but this is the first Kluot-related online sales event I’ve seen. The partnership seems fitting, Klout is about being popular, and Gilt is about wearing the most popular designer brands, so I’m interested to see how it grows and if it will expand to become a more regular offering. What else could Klout be good for besides reducing Gilt?

 

For inspiration, the story of airbnb

Joe Gebbia one of the founders of airbnb tells the story of his company.

Watch it.

PSFK CONFERENCE NYC 2011: Joe Gebbia from Piers Fawkes on Vimeo.

Bring on the feeling machines: Intuitive, honest smart devices to help us moderate our behavior and social interactions.

There are two friends everyone should have:

  • One who tells you the truth no matter how harsh (e.g. you don’t check into the gym enough, your dress-sense is subpar)
  • One who encourages you to be truthful to yourself and stop practicing self-destructive behaviors (e.g. your propensity to digitally stalk new/old flames/friends)

Already by your side,  your smartphone could serve both roles.

frog design wrote a great article featured on PSFK questioning the future role of our devices in the mitigation of our interaction with our environment and situations, and relationship with other social actors. They wonder: should we use our devices to encourage us to stay honest and prevent actions that have negative consequences?

The notion of intuitive, honest devices is interesting. When I read this article, I immediately thought of facebook and the way people use it to monitor former (and potential) paramours, in a way that prolongs the fixation. What if your smartphone could chide you from doing this, thereby helping you move on? Google Mail Googles for the emotionally drunk.

I am for technology as a reinforcing mechanism-friend who nudges me to be a better person, or find happiness, or at least encourage me to avoid actions that have ill effects. Bring on the feeling machines.

Read it: frog design: How Honest Should Smart Devices Be?

Grubbing with New Yorkers – Grub With Us, Too!

I think I might be addicted to meeting new people. Actually, it is an addiction to the possibility of meeting new people. First I joined couchsurfing, great, but people can be rather impermanent. Now, Grub With Us finally launched their New York site. I’m excited for new friends who live in my city!

Where to eat and who to meet!

I dis”Like” recent research that asserts facebook improves self-esteem

And thus science decreed, thou must create equivalent groups.

The conclusions that can be drawn in a new study about the effects of facebook are limited, if not erroneousness because the task given the second test group do not allow for meaningful analysis.

A recent study by Cornell’s Gonzales and Hancock published in a cyberpsychology and social networking (?!) journal asserts that using facebook can increase self-esteem as it allows users to stylize their social identity. While I don’t dispute that facebook might increase positive feelings about the self (and fuel narcissism), I do not think that the research methods used in their study allow us to draw that conclusion.

The researchers compared the self-esteem scores reported by three groups, after they each completed a different “self-focused” task. Group 1 was the control and their task was to stare at a blank screen. Group 2 was a test group and did the self-focused task of staring at a mirror. Group 3 surfed their facebook page and associated pages. Each group did completed the assigned task for three minutes and then completed the self-esteem measure.

The test groups in this study should all have had the same end goals, namely the ability to shape one’s persona. While looking in a mirror is a self-focused activity, it is not an engaging or active self-focused activity like updating ones profile, looking at pictures of the self and friends, or pursuing passions’ fanpages. I think a more comparable self-focused activities should have been used as a test groups. For instance, having respondents write a description of their personality and interests, as if describing themselves to a new friend. Related to the mirror idea, another test group could apply make-up or style their hair in front of a mirror prior to taking the self-esteem survey. Similar to the facebook group, I think the other test groups tasks should all feature the ability to actively preen one’s social appearance – physical and personality.

By comparing the self-esteem scores of these two test groups and the facebook group, we can see if facebook creates the change in self-esteem, or if it ability to choose how one is represented in the social sphere that increases self-esteem.

Only once equivalent groups are created can we start to analyze and understand  how social network usage affects users’ psyches.

I must note here that I haven’t read the paper, but if anyone wants to forward, I will gladly read.

Look at the following the links for summaries more info about this research:

Our Facebook wall boosts self-esteem, study finds - Cornell Chronicle

This is Your Brain on Facebook – Fast Company

Facebook makes you “Like” yourself better – PSFK

Better to use positive reinforcement or punishment to get people to the gym? A look at Gym-Pact

A few sites (PSFK and GOOD magazine) have featured articles about a new gym membership, Gym-Pact, that penalizes aspiring gym rats for not going to the gym.

Inspired by behavioral economics theories, this service launched last month, seeks to change consumer behavior through monetary punishment rather than more positive methods of reinforcement. I mention that is was launched last month (December 2010, good timing, corresponding with new years resolutions) because I am curious how long this service will survive. Personally, I would not pay to join a gym only to have the gym punish my bank account when I don’t show as often as planned.

I think  the idea is a good one; however, I think that the reinforcement would work better if it were positive. For instance, if the gym member completes the planned workouts, they get a 15% discount on membership. A small discount as incentive can benefit both the members and their gyms. The members go more often, improving their personal health, and the gym gets increased visitations. At least at my gym, increased visitation means more chances to sell smoothies, workout gear, training sessions, and renewals of annual membership.

Is this how grocery stores advertise in your neighborhood?

For a local grocery store that sells baked goods, veggies, meat, dairy, and household packaged goods, why does my local grocery choose only bakery items to feature on exterior signage?

Do consumers want “bagels, croissants, donuts, muffins” prior to heading to the store or only after they see the sign? (Donuts tried to woo me, luckily I have resisted.)

Would a store that featured “broccoli, cabbage, zucchini, spinach” have different purchase patterns and sales figures?